This Modified Two State Solution Peace Plan has been sent to all Israeli Knesset Members, WAFA (Palestinian News Agency), embassies of Jordan, Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Vatican in Washington DC, peace groups, news agencies, writers, professors, The White House, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
This write-up has been updated based on general and primary elections from the previous October 7, 2022 post.
I ask for readers of this Peace Plan to think outside of the box and develop their own ideas that I may not have even considered and provide a better solution and email it to the Secretary of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. The Norwegian Nobel Committee can be a useful platform to present these ideas to the world which may help solve this Israeli Palestinian conflict. If an idea is great, I am sure the Secretary of the Norwegian Committee will make the five voting committee members aware of it so that such person can be nominated by any committee member. I ask the Norwegian Nobel Committee to nominate and award three Nobel Peace Prizes in 2023 for individuals who have the best solutions for the Israeli Palestinian conflict. We need more voices about possible conflict resolutions to this problem. More is better!
The peace process can never start unless we initially address three items.
1. The Palestinian Authority (PA) recognizes Israel but refuses to recognize it as a Jewish state. The PA must recognize Israel as a Jewish state because Israel views the Palestinians and the PA as an entity seeking the destruction of the Jewish state. The PA must recognize Israel as a Jewish state within the pre-1967 borders of Israel. The areas within the 1966 municipal boundary of Jerusalem, Jordan will be settled through negotiations. The expansion of the city limits of eastern Jerusalem in the West Bank after the 1967 war by Israel should be the capital of Palestine.
2. The right of return will not be allowed based on item #1 of Israel being a Jewish State. Thus, the Israeli government should immediately cease building any new settlements in the West Bank and quit destroying Palestinian homes or evicting Palestinians. If the Israeli government wants to deny the Palestinians the "right of return" to Israel regarding property once owned by Palestinians and confiscated by Israel, then the Israelis have no right to seize property occupied by Palestinians in the West Bank no matter what claim Israel has on such land. The Israeli position is not fair nor equitable which prevents a resolution to this conflict.
3. The PA must quit the "pay to slay" for terrorist activities so that peace negotiations can resume between the two parties. I don't advocate such violence but there have been numerous times in history when a weaker party in a conflict resorts to such terrorist tactics. We see that during the last few years of the British Mandate in Palestine that Menachem Begin (later to become prime minister of Israel) participated in terrorist activities that killed innocent people and that the British government put a hefty bounty on his head. So when the Israelis accuse the Palestinians of doing terrorist activities, the Jews did the same thing when they were seeking their independence. The violence on both sides must cease.
As an American, I have to say that following B'Tselem has opened my eyes regarding this conflict. The US is big supporter of Israel but I believe that most US citizens do not have a full understanding of this conflict which has enabled the US government to allow Israel carte blanche actions in dealing with this conflict with no consequences. This needs to change. Of course I differ with B'Tselem when they use the word "apartheid" to describe this conflict which initially stems from the Palestinians and the PA refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state which implies the Palestinians desire for the destruction of such Jewish state. This is just an outright conflict between two peoples wanting the worse for each other which needs to stop. Both Israeli and Palestinian people need to recognize the right of both nations and peoples to exist.
Modified Two State Solution
Peace based on a Modified Two State Solution regarding voting rights for all people. Creation of a bi-national entity known as the United Nations of Jerusalem (UNJ) of a Jewish and Muslim state. A Jewish State of Israel within the pre-1967 borders and the Golan Heights. An Islamic State of Palestine in Gaza and the West Bank. Then a shared entity would be the 1966 municipal city limits of Jerusalem, Jordan which would be known as Jerusalem, UNJ. So there would be three Jerusalem entities. One in Israel (city west of the pre-1967 border), Palestine (expanded eastern city after the 1967 war), and the UNJ (municipal city boundary of Jerusalem, Jordan as of 1966).
Per the UNJ treaty, every person (Christian, Druze, Muslim, or Jew) residing in Israel, West Bank, Gaza, Golan Heights, and Jerusalem UNJ will vote for Israeli Knesset members who must be Jewish or a non-Jew who swears allegiance to the Jewish State of Israel, and will vote of Palestinian Parliament members who must be Muslim or a non-Muslim who swears allegiance to the Islamic State of Palestine. Every person regardless of religion will be granted the right to vote in both legislative elections in the UNJ but will be subject to the laws of the sovereign state they reside in. The sovereign Jewish State of Israel will administer laws and security within Israel and the Golan Heights. The sovereign Islamic State of Palestine will administer security and laws with Gaza and the West Bank.
This dual voting arrangement will secure peace among Jews and Muslims and will reduce the aspect of extremist who inflame this conflict from holding power. Jewish voters are not going to place Hamas extremist in a Palestinian Parliament. Likewise, Muslim voters are not going to place Israeli politicians in the Knesset who suppress Muslim rights.